|
|
December 1, 2008 Frequently Asked Questions
June 1, 2008 Frequently Asked Questions
April 21, 2008 Press Release
February 12, 2008 Status of Third Distribution
December 18, 2007 Status of Third Distribution
December 1, 2007 Frequently Asked Questions
October 5, 2007 Status of Litigation
June 1, 2007 Frequently Asked Questions
April 2, 2007 Press Release
April 2, 2007 Press Release
December 1, 2006 Frequently Asked Questions
June 1, 2006 Frequently Asked Questions
March 23, 2006 Press Release
December 1, 2005 Frequently Asked Questions
October 3, 2005 Press Release
August 25, President's Report Correction
July 27, 2005 Press Release
March 17, 2005 Press Release
January 24, 2005 Notice to Claim Holders
November 10, 2004 Frequently Asked Questions
October 04, 2004 Press Release
January 24, 2003 Press Release
September 30, 2002 Notice to Creditors' Committee
August 9, 2002 Press Release
July 26, 2002 Press Release
July 9, 2002 Press Release
May 10, 2002 Press Release
October 30, 2001 Press Release
August 21, 2001 Press Release
August 6, 2001 Press Release
June 11, 2001 Committee Meeting
May 7, 2001 Press Release
May 4, 2001 Committee Meeting
|
August 25, 2005 President's Report Correction
Evergreen Security, Ltd.
R.W. (Bill) Cuthill, Jr. Trustee
341 N. Maitland Ave., Ste. 210
Maitland, FL 32751
Telephone: 407-644-3781 Ext. 235
Facsimile: 407-644-3943
Email: rcuthill@msn.com
President's Report Correction
August 25, 2005
In the July President's Report sent to the Steering Committee and posted on the Evergreen website, Mr. Cuthill, as President of Evergreen Security, Ltd., made the following statement:
| During 2004 the second criminal trial for Anthony Huggins and Jon M. Knight was held in New York. Mr. Huggins and Mr. Knight were the owners of International Portfolio Analytics, Ltd., which was an investment advisor for Evergreen. The jury found Mr. Knight guilty on all counts, while it could not reach a verdict on Mr. Huggins. Mr. Knight filed an appeal. |
| Recently, Mr. Cuthill has learned the following information: |
| 1. The jury in the second criminal trial was asked to deliberate only with regard to one count and, thus, he was found guilty on only that count. |
| 2. The presiding judge entered no verdict against Mr. Knight subsequent to the jury finding. |
| 3. Mr. Knight did not file an appeal on this matter. |
|
